State v. Hanson’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on 83 Wash. App. 825 - State v. Hahn · Seeley v. State · Seeley v. State · Tollycraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy · State v. Shepherd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to allow patients with terminal or debilitating illness to legally use marijuana when authorized by their physician.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[n]o one has asked the pharmacy board to revisit the classification and it has apparently not seen fit to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Atchley“the Medical Marijuana Act only provides an affirmative defense to the drug crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.