State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2022
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ladson · State v. Mendez · State v. Parker · 138 Wash. 2d 343 - State v. Ladson · 137 Wash. 2d 208 - State v. Mendez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because we hold the trial court should have suppressed the evidence under the derivative exclusionary rule, we do not address Allen's argument that he has automatic standing to raise Peggy's constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. SHUFFELEN“[a]utomatic standing is not a vehicle to collaterally attack every police search that results in a seizure of contraband or evidence of a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. SHUFFELEN“[no] person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. SHUFFELEN
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.