Cedric Dennard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 848 So. 2d 287 - State v. McBride · 531 So. 2d 956 - Blackshear v. State · 882 So. 2d 977 - Moore v. State · 838 So. 2d 554 - Butler v. State · 916 So. 2d 29 - Almendares v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is unclear on how a sentence should be imposed in cases where there are multiple offenses for sentencing and the sentencing points result in a[n] [LPS] above the statutory maximum,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Champagne v. State“consecutive sentencing to achieve an LPS without exceeding the statutory maximum for any one offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Champagne v. State“may impose a sentence up to and including the statutory maximum for any offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Champagne v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.