157 So. 3d 435 - Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 911 So. 2d 1222 - Zold v. Zold · Windom v. State · 630 So. 2d 673 - Coppola v. Coppola · 978 So. 2d 858 - Trespalacios v. Trespalacios · Cissel v. Cissel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n award of alimony must be based on the income that is available to the party, i.e., the party's net monthly income.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“For the purpose of determining the amount of income that is attributable to a spouse in computing alimony, section 61.046(8), Florida Statutes (2010), defines “income” as any form of payment to an individual, regardless of source, including, but not limited to: wages, salary, commissions and bonuses, compensation as an independent contractor, worker’s compensation, disability benefits, annuity and retirement benefits, pensions, dividends, interest, royalties, trusts, and any other payments, made by any person, private entity, federal or state government, or any unit of local government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcheck v. Marcheck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.