Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 SO3D 956 - Duran v. Buckner

Duran v. Buckner’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Daniels v. Williams · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Paul v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After an investigator's assessment of the reported child abuse or neglect, DHR typically designates either an 'indicated' or 'not indicated' disposition for the report. An 'indicated' disposition is defined as '[w]hen credible evidence and professional judgment substantiates that an alleged perpetrator is responsible for child abuse or neglect.' § 26-14-8(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “discharged, demoted, or rejected from a job”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.