Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 SW2D 936 - Stephens v. Underwood

Stephens v. Underwood’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1985

6 state decisions

4019411950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vogel v. Allen · Curlee Clothing Co. v. Wickliffe · Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Connellee · Miller v. Fenner, Beane & Ungerleider · Brokaw v. Collett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Long before the Negotiable Instruments Law was in force, the general rule was announced that where a party to a negotiable instrument intrusts it to the custody of another, with blanks not filled in, such negotiable instrument carries on its face an implied authority to fill in the blanks and perfect the instrument, so far as consistent with its printed words.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.