Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

157 S.W.3d 343

State v. McClendon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 2005

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2005-02-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2007

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Donald C. McClendon (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of attempted stealing of a motor vehicle, Section 564.011, RSMo 2000, and Section 570.030.3(3), RSMo Cum.Supp. 2004, for which Defendant was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender under Section 558.016, RSMo Cum.Supp.2004.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/157/sw3d/343 · .json · Public domain