Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 SW3D 387 - State v. Newberry

State v. Newberry’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Rousan · State v. Edwards · State v. Glass · State v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A court is not obligated to charge the jury with respect to an included offense unless there is a basis for a verdict acquitting the defendant of the offense charged and convicting him of the included offense. Doubt as to whether to instruct on the included offense is to be resolved in favor of instructing on the included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.