Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 U.S. 655 - Bergemann v. Backer

Bergemann v. Backer’s Empirical Analysis

157 U.S. 655 · 1895

Citation profile

124
cited by 124 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 10 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 124 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2022 · most notably Fay v. Noia (1963), Stone v. Powell (1976)

37 federal appellate · 10 district · 14 state decisions

24018951900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Andrews v. Swartz · Caldwell v. State of Texas · New York v. Eno · Davis v. People of Territory of Utah

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a state court has jurisdiction of the offense and the accused, under an indictment found under statutes of the state not void under the constitution of the United States, and proceeds to judgment under such statutes, a circuit court of the United States has no authority to interfere with the execution of the sentence by means of a writ of habeas corpus.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “add any case to nor take any case from the class of crimes which, at common law, was denominated `murder,' for every act that was murder at common law was still murder in New Jersey.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “did willfully, feloniously, and of his malice aforethought kill and murder”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.