Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 VT 553 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2022

12 state decisions

801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hawk · State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Smith · Caledonian-Record Publishing Co. v. Walton · State v. Forbes · State v. Ericksen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he sanction of dismissal with prejudice should be used only “sparingly,” and ordinarily should follow a forewarning. The forewarning requirement has been applied in cases where the prosecution does not go forward and present its case after it has been denied a continuance. It ensures that the prosecution is able to choose between going to trial and taking the sanction of dismissal with prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The court may refuse to grant a continuance where it finds the continuance would not be 'in the interests of justice.' "). Indeed, Rule 50 states that the affidavit must specify "the measures taken to procure his or her attendance or deposition, to the end that the court may judge whether due diligence has been used for that purpose .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hile the trial court may often rely on representations of counsel in situations where there is no challenge to the factual assertions, it retains the right to insist on compliance with the affidavit requirement to resolve bona fide contests.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.