Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Vt. 657 - State v. Marcello

State v. Marcello’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
15
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably United States v. King (1993), 136 Ohio App. 3d 46 - State v. Norman (1999)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 83 state decisions — followed in 15 states

4401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brown v. Texas · Cady v. Dombrowski · State v. Pinkham · State v. Emilo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In some circumstances ... police officers without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity are allowed to intrude on a person's privacy to carry out 'community caretaking' functions to enhance public safety.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Nothing in the Fourth Amendment requires that the 'specific and articulable facts' relate to suspected criminal activity. ... If we were to insist upon suspicion of activity amounting to a criminal or civil infraction to meet the [Terry] standard, we would be overlooking the police officer's legitimate role as a public servant to assist those in distress and to maintain and foster public safety."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “safety reasons alone can be sufficient to justify a stop, but they must be based upon specific and articulable facts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.