Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Wash. 333 - Epley v. Hunter

Epley v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1945
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stickney v. Congdon · Epley v. Hunter · Applewhite v. Wayne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court of review is precluded from agitating .questions which were propounded, considered, and decided on a previous review; the decisions agree that, as a general rule, when an appellate court passes upon a question and remands the cause for further proceedings, the question there settled becomes the daw of the case’ upon a subsequent appeal; the only mode for reviewing the decision on the prior appeal being by a motion for a rehearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.