Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 WASH2D 167 - State v. Easterling

State v. Easterling’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neder v. United States · Waller v. Georgia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California for County of Riverside · 123 Wash. 2d 296 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Lord

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “1. The proponent of closure ... must make some showing [of a compelling interest], and where that need is based on a right other than an accused's right to a fair trial, the proponent must show a `serious and imminent threat' to that right. "2. Anyone present when the closure motion is made must be given an opportunity to object to the closure. "3. The proposed method for curtailing open access must be the least restrictive means available for protecting the threatened interests. "4. The court must weigh the competing interests of the proponent of closure and the public. "5. The order must be no broader in its application or duration than necessary to serve its purpose.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he denial of the constitutional right to a public trial is one of the limited classes of fundamental rights not subject to harmless error analysis.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.