Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 157 Wis. 2d 13 - Hobl v. Lord

157 Wis. 2d 13 - Hobl v. Lord’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 506

Relies on 94 Wis. 2d 153 - County of Columbia v. Bylewski · 96 Wis. 2d 630 - State v. Burkman · Lindsey v. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis · 97 Wis. 2d 193 - State v. White · 6 Ill. 2d 215 - Skach v. Sykora

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Requiring Lord to redeem by paying the full foreclosure judgment would effectively nullify the bankruptcy court's actions [stripping down the value of Farm Credit's lien to $50,000.00].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Hobl does not argue that Lord’s redemption is too late because it was made after the sheriffs sale. Hobl concedes that “sale” under § 846.13, Stats., means the confirmation of the sale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.