157 Wis. 2d 447 - State v. Roberson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2010
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 128 Wis. 2d 110 - State v. Holt · 135 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Friedrich · 77 Wis. 2d 89 - State v. Spraggin · 146 Wis. 2d 1 - State v. Mink · 139 Wis. 2d 424 - State v. Evers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. This subsection does not exclude the evidence when offered for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“prejudice refers to the potential harm in a jury concluding that, because an actor committed one bad act, he [or she] necessarily committed the crime charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Evidence showing a plan establishes a definite prior design, plan, or scheme which includes the doing of the act charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.