Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 A2D 716 - I. v. D.

I. v. D.’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
October 1977
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 48 N.J. Super. 566 - Gosschalk v. Gosschalk · Borough of Park Ridge v. Salimone · Brennan v. State · Frelinghuysen v. Town of Morristown · Midler v. Heinowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are, however, reluctant to visit the defendant with paternity of a child where it is possible that legal evidence he was foreclosed from developing on cross-examination might have been weighty enough to change the preponderance of the evidence as to' his responsibility. The interests of justice require that the case be remanded to the County Court for the continuance of plaintiff’s cross-examination in the respects noted above, and for the taking of such additional proofs as either of the parties wishes to adduce concerning plaintiff’s other male associations, or the absence thereof, during the period when the child could have been conceived.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.