Fortune v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · George Smith Warden v. Lee Robbins · State v. Thiel · United States v. Cross · Nathan DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) whether errors of counsel actually had an adverse effect on the defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Fahnley v. State · Ford v. State“post-conviction court's legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.