Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Ariz. 525 - State v. Natoli

State v. Natoli’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Burgett v. Texas · Santoni v. United States · United States v. Timmreck · Harris v. McRae

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In summary, we hold that when a record of conviction shows that a defendant was advised of his right to counsel, and voluntarily waived counsel, and the record is otherwise regular on its face, a defendant is precluded from collaterally attacking the validity of that conviction when it is used for enhancement of sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.