158 Cal. App. 2d 330 - Tibbets v. Robb’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 1968
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richter v. Walker · Haigler v. Donnelly · Barkis v. Scott · 46 Cal. 2d 517 - Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co. · 136 Cal. App. 2d 567 - White v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"... 1 The presumption that the record includes all matters material to a determination of the points on appeal does not apply to a judgment roll appeal unless the error claimed by appellant appears on the face of the record (rule 52). The sufficiency of the evidence cannot be reviewed. “In this type of appeal, since ‘the evidence is not before this court, we are confined to a determination of the questions as to whether the complaint states a cause of action; whether the findings are within the issue; whether the judgment is supported by the findings and whether reversible error appears upon the face of the record.’ ” (Hunt v. Plavsa, 103 Cal. App.2d 222, 224 [ 229 P.2d 482 ].) ’ (Tibbets v. Robb, 158 Cal. App.2d 330, 337 [ 322 P.2d 585 ].)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.