Davis v. Crompton’s Empirical Analysis
158 F. 735 · 1907
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1926
4 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mueller v. Nugent · York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Frank Thompson v. Henry Fairbanks · Hewit v. Berlin Machine Works · Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The title reserved h.v the vendor in a Pennsylvania contract of conditional sale, free from fraud, until payment of the purchase money, is good against, all the world, except as to creditors of the vendee who had acquired a lien by levy or attachment npon the property while it was in the possession of the vendee, and under section 70a (5) his trustee takes title subject to the superior title of the vendor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Gartman““unless the court shall on due notice, order that the right under such • * * * attachment * * * shall be preserved for the benefit of the estate.” Bankruptcy Aet, § 67f (Comp. St. § 9651).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Prentice
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.