Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.1d 950 - Ruggles v. Buckley

Ruggles v. Buckley’s Empirical Analysis

158 F. 950 · 1908

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1958
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1958

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

40190819101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meehan v. Valentine · Eber Ward Survivor Owner of the Steamboat Detroit v. Charles Thompson · Paul v. Cullum · Kane's Estate · Fechteler v. Palm Bros. & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is just these hardships which a court of equity cannot relieve by rescinding contracts, or making new ones by construction, through the process of balancing blame for nonperformance, and going into parol proof of other or different conditions than those expressed in the contracts themselves, intentions relative to failures not anticipated at the time the contracts were made, or not provided for by the terms of the agreements, as they would have been if the parties had not been improvident in neglecting such protection as was open to them against possible failure and change of conditions. The reasonableness of a contract, Its fairness and justice, are to he determined as of the time when the parties entered into it, and so of the intentions involved in the construction of their agreements, and none of these are to be influenced by the force of subsequent changes in events or circumstances.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.