Overly v. Overly

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dec. 20, 1946.

Decided Dec. 27, 1946.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-12-27

2 counsel of record

Relies on Overly v. Overly

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-12-27

¶1Robert VanderVoort, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

¶2Elder W. Marshall, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

¶3Before GOODRICH and McLAUGH-LIN, Circuit Judges, and MURPHY, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is an action to establish an alleged oral trust in personal property. The District Court, 65 F.Supp. 174, found against the plaintiff and this finding is the subject *385of appeal. The questions involved are wholly those of fact; the parties have no substantial dispute on the legal points. We have examined the record upon the matters concerning which the appellant claims that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. The facts do not, in our opinion, bear out the claim. The judgment is therefore affirmed.