Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

158 F.2d 651

Docket Nos. 9263, 9264.

Warde v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 12, 1946.

Decided Dec. 16, 1946.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-12-16

2 counsel of record

Relies on Milton v. United States · Nelson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-12-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1988

10 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

5019461950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Richard L. Merrick, of Washington, D. C., submitted on the brief for appellants.

¶2Mr. Sidney S. Sachs, Assistant United States Attorney, of Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Edward M. Curran, United States Attorney at the time the brief was filed, and Charles B. Murray, Assistant United States Attorney, both of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, submitted for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, CLARK and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellants were convicted of keeping gaming tables. D.C.Code 1940, § 22— 1504. There are conflicts in the testimony, but the convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. The tenant of the premises was an incorporated club but there was evidence that appellants took part in carrying on its gambling activities. They were therefore responsible as principals. D.C.Code 1940, § 22 — 105. There was evidence of gambling on more than one occasion. Moreover, one occasion was enough. Nelson v. United States, 28 App.D.C. 32, 37. Testimony of appellant Walling at a previous trial, together with a bank statement to which it related, were rightly admitted since this testimony had some tendency to establish his guilt. Milton v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 394, 110 F.2d 556. Appellants’ other contentions are also without merit.

¶6Affirmed.

/158/f2d/651 · .json · Public domain