Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.2d 678 - Sternberg Dredging Co. v. Walling

Sternberg Dredging Co. v. Walling’s Empirical Analysis

158 F.2d 678 · 1946

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably Rice v. United States (1966), Bruhn's Freezer Meats of Chicago, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture (1971)

21 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

9019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 33 U.S.C. § 901

Relies on United States v. American Trucking Associations · South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. Bassett · International Stevedoring Co. v. Haverty · Warner v. Goltra · Helena Glendale Ferry Co. v. Walling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the interpretation of a statute its words are to be taken according to the meaning given them in common useage, unless to do so produces an absurd result or one which defeats the purpose for which the Act was passed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.