Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.2d 68 - Porter v. Shibe

Porter v. Shibe’s Empirical Analysis

158 F.2d 68 · 1946

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1977
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1977

7 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

901946195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yakus v. United States · Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Virginian Ry Co v. System Federation No 40 · United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co. · United States v. Macintosh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That section 1(b) of tbe Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, is amended by striking out ‘June 30, 1946’ and substituting ‘June 30, 1947’.” Section 18 of sucb Act in part reads: “(1) The provisions of this Act shall take effect as of June 30, 1946, and (2) all regulations, orders, price schedules, and requitements under tbe Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, * * * and tbs Stabilization Act of 1942, as amended, wliieb were in effect on June 30, 1946, shall be in effect in tbe same manner and to tbe same extent as if this Act bad been enacted on June 30, 1946, * * * : Provided fm-ther, That no act or transaction, or omission or failure to act, occurring subsequent to June 30, 1946, and prior to the date of enactment of this Act shall be deemed to be a violation of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, or tbe Stabilization Act of 1942, as amended, or of any regulation, order, price schedule, or requirement under either of such Acts: * U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901a note.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.