Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

158 F.2d 800

Docket Nos. 10211, 10212.

Greenberg v. Commissioner

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 11, 1946.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-12-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1954

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Commissioner v. Tower · Lusthaus v. Commissioner · Greenberg v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert Ash, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

¶2J. P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, and Bernard D. Daniels, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

¶3Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5These consolidated causes were heard upon the transcript of record, briefs and arguments of counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged that *801the decision of the Tax Court that there is a deficiency in the income tax of Leonard Greenberg for the year 1941 in the amount of $19,533.53 is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the opinion and findings of fact of the Tax Court promulgated September 18, 1945, 5 T.C. 732; and upon the authority of Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, both decided by the Supreme Court on February 25, 1946.

¶6And it is further ordered and adjudged, in accordance with the motion filed by petitioners on March 4, 1946, that the decision of the Tax Court that there is a deficiency in the income tax of William Areson, in the amount of $19,680.71, for the year 1941 is likewise affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons hereinabove set forth.

/158/f2d/800 · .json · Public domain