Hemans v. Matthews

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 26, 1946.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1946-09-26

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 463

Relies on United States ex rel. Maritote v. McDonnell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1946-09-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1974

6 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. O. R. McGuire, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Messrs. Edward M. Curran, U. S. Atty., Edward Molenof and Leonard M. Coster, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

¶3Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and CLARK and WILBUR K. MILLER, JJ.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5On motion of appellant for a stay of execution of the order of removal pending hearing and decision on the appeal herein, and on the motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the Court is without jurisdiction to hear an appeal which seeks to test the validity of the warrant of removal on which appellant is now held, It is

¶6Ordered by the Court that this appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. § 463(b); U.S. ex rel. Maritote v. McDonnell, 7 Cir., 135 F.2d 342.