Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.2d 944 - Walling v. Twyeffort, Inc.

Walling v. Twyeffort, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

158 F.2d 944 · 1947

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
March 2015
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2015 · most notably Rutherford Food Corp. v. McComb (1947), Brock v. Superior Care, Inc. (1988)

12 federal appellate · 5 district ·

10019471950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 211

Relies on United States v. Darby · National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. · Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel · Walling US v. Helmerich & Payne · Gemsco, Inc. v. Walling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After the employees on the premises cut material in accordance with patterns made there for each customer, the material, together with linings, thread, buttons and other trimmings, is sent to tailors working off the premises, to be sewed according to specific instructions contained on an accompanying tag, these being sufficiently detailed to direct the tailors exactly how to sew and complete the garments and obviating any need of further control, supervision or instructions or the exercise of judgment on their part.” (Emphasis mine.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Drawing the line between employees and independent contractors cannot be done mechanically; it calls for rational judgment as the facts vary, * * *.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.