Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.3d 1085 - Newsted v. Gibson

Newsted v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis

158 F.3d 1085 · 1998

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably Dion Smallwood v. Gary Gibson Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma - (1999), Moore v. Gibson (1999)

10 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

220199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]vidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been dii-ferent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “analysis focusing solely on mere outcome determination, without attention to whether the result of the proceeding was fundamentally unfair or unreliable, is defective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Homicide is manslaughter in the first degree in the following cases: 8. When perpetrated unnecessarily either while resisting an attempt by the person killed to commit a crime, or after such attempt shall have failed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.