Fultz v. Embry’s Empirical Analysis
158 F.3d 1101 · 1998
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2023
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Marks v. United States · Bouie v. City of Columbia · Lynce v. Mathis · United States v. Morehead
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“alter[ ] the definition of criminal conduct or increas[e] the punishment for the crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that are ‘unexpected and indefensible by reference to the law which had been expressed prior to the conduct in issue.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Willingham v. Mullin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.