United States v. Podolsky’s Empirical Analysis
158 F.3d 12 · 1998
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2016
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'n · United States v. Martinson · Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. · United States v. Morillo · Camilo-Robles v. Hoyos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n appellate court, faced with the task of reviewing an inscrutable order, may either remand for a fuller exposition or act, without remanding, if a reasonable basis supporting the order is made manifest on the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.