Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.3d 1230 - Brooks v. Miller

Brooks v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

158 F.3d 1230 · 1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently April 2023

9 federal appellate ·

801998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Thornburg v. Gingles · City of Mobile v. Bolden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Gingles , the necessary showing was that the minority group was sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district; such a showing was logical because the plaintiffs were alleging vote dilution in a system of multimember legislative districts. In judicial cases, however, single-member districts may run counter to the state’s judicial model. Thus, the question under the first Gingles threshold factor may not be whether the minority group could constitute a majority in a single-member district, but whether, within the state’s judicial model, there exists an alternative election scheme that could serve as an appropriate section 2 remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.