Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 F.3d 1313 - Serono Laboratories, Inc. v. Shalala

Serono Laboratories, Inc. v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

158 F.3d 1313 · 1998

Citation profile

234
cited by 234 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 149 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 234 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc. (2007), Davenport v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (1999)

54 federal appellate · 149 district · 2 state decisions

13101998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Auer v. Robbins · Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc. · McCarthy v. Bronson · CityFed Financial Corp. v. Office of Thrift Supervision

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 234 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “regardless whether there may be other reasonable, or even more reasonable, views.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If, as we have held, [the movant] is not likely to establish that [the] ANDA was wrongly approved, then public interest considerations weigh against an injunction. The purpose of the Hatch-Wax-man Amendments was, after all, ‘to increase competition in the drug industry by facilitating the approval of generic copies of drugs.’ Congress expected that competition ‘to make available more low cost generic drugs.’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “But Chevron deference is owed to the decisionmaker authorized to speak on behalf of the agency, not to each individual agency employee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.