Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1946
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 1959
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““For an assignment of error merely to state that the court erred in entering a specified order is customarily treated as sufficient in our practice, but it is not conducive to the best results. An assignment of error is in the nature of a declaration or complaint. It should state a case. “An appellate court should be liberal in not exacting too much nicety in the specifications of error assigned, and on the contrary the appellants should be generous in designating with a fair degree of certainty the specific grounds for reversal. See 2 Am. Jur., Sec. 694, et seq.” (Italics added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.