Mausolf v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2014
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · Donaldson v. United States · Trbovich v. United Mine Workers · Diamond v. Charles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he question of standing ... is irrelevant to our determination of whether the Association may intervene as of right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mausolf v. Babbitt“The Defendants represent the citizenry on matters of wildlife and wilderness preservation....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mausolf v. Babbitt“local and individual interests not shared by the general citizenry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mausolf v. Babbitt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.