In re Prudential Securities Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2014
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1407
Relies on Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co. · Walton v. Eaton Corp. · 416 F. Supp. 161 - In Re Equity Funding Corp. of America Securities Litigation · Garber v. Randell · Washington v. New York City Board of Estimate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not merge the suits into a single cause, or change the rights of the parties, or make those who are parties in one suit parties in another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re TMI Litigation“convenience and economy in administration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re TMI Litigation
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.