Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 FSUPP2D 1215 - Clark v. Stovall

Clark v. Stovall’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396B (§ 1903 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396K (§ 1912 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn. · Green v. Mansour

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “distribute collections as follows — (a) To itself, an amount equal to State Medicaid expenditures for the individual on whose right the collection was based. (b) To the Federal Government, the Federal Share of the State Medicaid expenditures.... (c) To the recipient, any remaining amount.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] State may use amounts recovered or paid to the State as part of a comprehensive or individual settlement, or a judgment, described in clause (i) for any expenditures determined appropriate by the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any amount recovered or paid to a State as part of the comprehensive settlement of November 1998 between manufacturers of tobacco products . . . and State Attorneys General.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.