Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Ga. App. 671 - Taylor v. Thompson

158 Ga. App. 671 - Taylor v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably 174 Ga. App. 881 - Kirby v. Chester (1985), Tampa Investment Group, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (2012)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

1001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Giordano v. Stubbs · 127 Ga. App. 758 - Thompson v. Maslia · Oliver v. Slack · Benton & Brother v. Singleton · Salter v. Bank of Commerce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By virtue of the judgment obtained on the note prior to foreclosure sale, [appellee would be] indebted to [appellant] for the full amount of such judgment. Because of this prior judgment, [appellee would be] liable to [appellant] for any sum remaining after application of the proceeds of the foreclosure sale. Thus, there [would be] no purpose to be served by [appellant] filing the petition for confirmation of the sale under power because no action for deficiency [would be] necessary. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When a creditor who holds a promissory note secured by a deed to secure debt containing a power of sale sues on the note and obtains a money judgment and thereafter elects to exercise the power of sale in the deed to secure debt, and the proceeds of such sale are not sufficient to satisfy the judgment, he is not required to comply with [OCGA § 44-14-161 (a)] before attempting to enforce further his judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the creditor wishes to exercise a power of foreclosure prior to obtaining a judgment on the note and thereby save time and expense, he will be required to comply with the confirmation statute before instituting [or continuing] any action for a deficiency judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.