Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 Ind. App. 260 - Maynard v. State

158 Ind. App. 260 - Maynard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 1977
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · White v. State · Gamble v. Lewis · Graham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The first move on the part of appellant was to seek a mistrial. A mistrial was sought after appellant had sat idly by and failed to make an objection. In Dull v. State (1962), 242 Ind. 633 , 180 N.E.2d 523 , this court said: ‘. . . A party may not sit idly by and make no objections to matters he might consider prejudicial, awaiting the outcome of a trial, and thereafter raise such question for the first time.’ See also Gamble v. Lewis (1949), 227 Ind. 455 , 85 N.E.2d 629 , Kern v. Bridwell (1889), 119 Ind. 226 , 21 N.E. 664 . Both of these cases are quoted with authority in Dull v. State, supra, and the whole matter was probably succinctly put by this Court in Gamble v. Lewis, supra, in this: ‘. . . We cannot permit litigants to gamble on the possibility of a favorable verdict, . . See also: Maynard v. State (1973), 158 Ind. App. 260 , 302 N.E.2d 520 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.