158 Ind. App. 441 - Bland v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Griffin v. California · Rowley v. State · Blume v. State · Long v. State · Bradburn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The action of this court, in deciding this issue as presented by the facts of the case, could at first blush be understood as sanctioning something akin to invited error in that there was no request for admonishment of the jury or for withdrawal of submission. Griffin v. California, [supra], leaves no doubt that the Fifth Amendment, via the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence in the courts of the several states. We are of the opinion our options are eliminated when choosing between the proper procedural aspects of this case, i. e., failure to seek the approved method of correcting error, and the Fifth Amendment rights of the defendants.” 158 Ind.App. at 444-5 , 303 N.E.2d at 63 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.