158 Ind. App. 61 - Prather v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 1982
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on White v. State · Johns v. State · Gregory v. State · Pryor v. State · Lolla v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the case at bar, Prather admitted selling LSD to Dausch. Dausch testified that Prather told him at the time of the sale that the pills contained LSD. Dausch testified that the pills induced hallucinations, caused him to hear ‘all kinds of weird noises,’ made stationary objects appear to be moving, and rapidly increased his pulse. “We hold that the above evidence, although circumstantial in nature, is sufficient to identify the pills as LSD when coupled with Prather’s admission.” Prather v. State, (1973) 158 Ind.App. 61, 67-68 , 301 N.E.2d 667, 671 . (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Warthan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.