158 Ind. App. 82 - Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1991
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Ware v. State · Sayne v. State · Smeltzer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Notwithstanding what may appear to be a preclusion of the use of presentence investigation reports in convictions by jury which require a determinate sentence except as to suspension or probation, consideration of such report by a court acting without a jury would be hollow and meaningless indeed if it could not be used to assist the court in exercising its statutory discretion as to the particular determinant sentence permissible within a minimum-maximum range.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Presentence report required. — No defendant convicted of a felony shall be sentenced before a written presentence report is prepared by a probation officer and considered by the sentencing court. . . .” (Our emphasis.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.