Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 KAN 196 - Jones v. Jones

Jones v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Overstreet v. Beadles · Moore v. Meek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is not necessary that payment be in money; anything accepted by the creditor is sufficient, provided it is actually accepted. However, where the special circumstances of the case demand it, equity has allowed subrogation in cases were [where] a liability only, and not payment, was shown/ ” (p. 199.) (See, 83 C. J. S., Subrogation, §10, p. 608.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.