Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 KAN 242 - Cole v. Thacker

Cole v. Thacker’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
3
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

2 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 1999 · most notably Bollinger v. Nuss (1969), Grant v. Reed (1947)

2 district · 36 state decisions

180194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erwin v. Erwin · Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Hatton · Ryan v. Ryan · Tennent v. Battey · Causemaker v. DeRoo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... A proceeding in garnishment is a special and extraordinary remedy given by statute and can be resorted to only under the conditions and procedure expressly authorized by the statute. The statutory conditions for its exercise are conclusive, and exclusive of all others, and cannot be extended to cover general procedural conditions and situations otherwise provided for by the statute. . . .” (p. 250.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The plaintiff may unite several causes of action in the same petition, whether they be such as have been heretofore denominated legal or equitable, or both. But tire causes of action so united must affect all tire parties to the action, except in actions to enforce mortgages or other liens.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The proceedings against a garnishee shall be deemed an action by the plaintiff against the garnishee and defendant, as parties defendant, and all the pro- • visions for enforcing judgments shall be applicable thereto”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.