Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 KAN 253 - Sharp v. Cox

Sharp v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 1954
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co. · Burks v. Aldridge · Grentner v. Fehrenschield · Owens v. Deutch · Rakestraw v. State Highway Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “instigated, caused and procured the arrest and confinement of said plaintiff * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.