Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 KAN 423 - Malcolm v. Larson

Malcolm v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 1997

19 state decisions

80194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. Wollard · Foss v. Wiles · Burns v. Drake · Yeager v. Yeager · Shively v. Burr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When cross demands have existed between persons under such circumstances that, if one had brought an action against the other, a counterclaim or setoff could have been set up, neither can be deprived of the benefit thereof by the assignment or death of the other or by reason of the statute of limitations; but the two demands must be deemed compensated so far as they equal each other.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Section 24 of the code of civil procedure, which declares that, ‘When a right of action is barred by the provisions of any statute, it shall be unavailable either as a cause of action or ground of defense,’ is construed to mean that a barred right of action cannot be used as a setoff, or counterclaim, or for the purpose of obtaining affirmative relief, but not to apply to matters of pure defense.” (Syl. 4.) (Our emphasis.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.