Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 KAN 495 - Pennington v. Wasson

Pennington v. Wasson’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
5
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1991

17 state decisions

60194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gustafson v. Bowling · Kininmonth v. Carson · Menke v. Duwe · Brown v. Webster · Frontier Lodge No. 104 v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The general rule is, that if two persons execute wills at the same time, either by one or two instruments, making reciprocal dispositions in favor of each other, the mere execution of such wills does not impose such a legal obligation as will prevent revocation, (a) Agreements to make wills are not established merely because two persons simultaneously make reciprocal testamentary dispositions in favor of each other, when the language of such wills contains nothing to the effect that the instruments are the result of a contract.’ (Syl. |2.)” (pp. 500, 501.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The separate wills of two persons which are reciprocal in their provisions giving the property of each to the other are not inherently contractual, where the wills do not so declare, and where there is no evidence of an agreement by the testators to that effect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.