Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 La. 432 - Bailey v. Williams

Bailey v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 1985

19 state decisions

501925193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Soniat v. Whitmer · Ludeling v. Garrett · Gilkerson-Sloss Commission Co. v. Yale & Bowling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The opponents have asked for damages on account of the seizure of their cattle. They are clearly entitled to attorney fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.