Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 La. 471 - State v. Foss

State v. Foss’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
5
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2001 · most notably State v. Goins (1957), 337 So. 2d 1096 - State v. Burnette (1976)

35 state decisions

100192519301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Duncan · State v. Hataway · State v. Rose · In re Pleasant Hill Lumber Co. · State v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In natural reason one should not complain of a thing done with his consent. And the law, in all its departments, follows this principle. “If, except where some counter doctrine presses with a superior force forbidding, a party has requested, or consented to any step taken in the proceedings, or if at the time for him to object thereto he did not, he cannot afterward complain of it, however contrary it was to his constitutional, statutory, or common-law rights.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Moreover, the proceedings on a statutory legal holiday are not necessarily null. They may be held on that day by consent. Besides, an accused may be concluded by his silence, if he chooses to remain silent when he is represented by counsel amply able to protect his rights. ......”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An accused party at whose instance and on whose persuasive promise a case has been continued and concluded on Sunday, and who took the chances of an acquittal, should not be permitted, after verdict of conviction, to challenge the regularity and legality of such proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.