Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 158 MONT 496 - State v. Bennett

State v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2006

17 state decisions

901972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Johnson v. United States · Ker v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A peace officer may arrest a person when: "(a) He has a warrant commanding that such person be arrested, or "(b) He believes, on reasonable grounds, that a warrant for the person's arrest has been issued in this state, or "(c) He believes, on reasonable grounds, that a felony warrant for the person's arrest has been issued in another jurisdiction, or "(d) He believes on reasonable grounds, that the person is committing an offense, or that the person has committed an offense and the existing circumstances require his immediate arrest. " (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`reasonable grounds for belief of guilt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A peace officer may arrest a person when:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.